close



2017阿基師年菜食譜大全

記者張克銘／綜合報導

▲混雙辛吉絲(左)與佩斯(右)搭擋奪冠(圖／達志影像／美聯社)

網壇女將辛吉絲(Martina Hingis)再添一筆傳奇，她與印度老將佩斯(Leander Paes)搭擋，在澳網混雙決賽以6:4、6:3獲勝，奪下冠軍，海鮮吃到飽 中壢這是她第17座大滿貫冠軍。

辛吉絲與佩斯在澳網混雙一路過關斬將，還擊敗我國網球女將謝淑薇，決賽更只花了62分鐘，在全場一共破了對手5個發球局的情況下，直落二輕取對手。

現年34歲的辛吉絲，過往可是網球甜心的先驅，當時以16歲奪下大滿貫冠軍，成為最年輕的大滿貫冠軍，也是最年輕世界排名第一，1997年奪取澳網、溫網、美網女單冠軍，法網獲得亞軍。

▲辛吉絲奪下澳網混雙冠軍(圖／達志影像屏東 烤肉食材／美聯社)

辛吉絲現大多以雙打比賽為主，這座冠軍是她相隔9年再次獲得大滿貫冠軍。此外這是她個人第26場大滿貫決賽，她一共獲得5座女單冠軍、9座女雙冠軍、3座混雙冠軍。

她的搭擋印度人佩斯也是雙打好手，生涯在雙打領域中，已經獲得15座大滿貫冠軍。同時他是許多傳奇球星喜愛的雙打搭擋，除了跟辛吉絲外，還曾跟娜拉提諾娃(Martina Navratilova)合作過雙打。

>>>接收更多精彩賽事，歡迎加入《ETtoday運動雲》粉絲蘆洲安格斯牛肉團

★圖片為版權照片，由達志影像供《ETtoday東森新聞雲》專用，任何網站、報刊、電視台未經達志影像許可，不得部分或全部轉載！



2017-01-0503觀音燒烤推薦:00

CONFLICT OF INTEREST? One of the members of a committee investigating the NTU president is said to be a coauthor; another is a college dean he appointedBy Sean Lin / Staff reporterAcademics yesterday questioned the integrity of a committee tasked with investigating allegations National Taiwan University （NTU） president Yang Pan-chyr （楊泮池） was involved in cowriting forged scientific papers.Quoting NTU secretary-general Lin Ta-te （林達德）, who said the five-member investigation committee includes two faculty members at the university, attorney Hsu Wen-hua （許文華） said that the two members are likely to be College of Life Sciences dean Min Ming-yuan （閔明源） and College of Medicine dean Chang Shan-chwen （張上淳）.“Assuming I am right, these two men are not suited to serve on the committee,” Hsu said, citing an NTU rule governing cases involving suspected breach of academic ethics, which states the selection of investigation committee members should not constitute a conflict of interest.Chang and Yang cowrote five scientific papers between 2003 and 2006, for which Chang was either listed as the first author or corresponding author, while Yang was listed as the corresponding author on some accounts, he said.Min was appointed acting dean by Yang when NTU professor Kuo Min-liang （郭明良） — with whom Yang coauthored four problematic articles that are now being investigated by the committee — assumed the post of Kaohsiung Medical University vice president, Hsu said.Yang later chose Min over another university professor to fill the post of College of Life Sciences dean, Hsu said.Hsu also raised doubts about why Yang was able to tell the media the constitution of the committee, which included two NTU faculty members and three Academia Sinica members, saying that Yang could have rigged the appointment of committee members.NTU should have sent the papers in question to the journals that published them for verification, and at least one other established and objective third-party academic for review to ensure the investigation’s credibility, he said.Saying that Kuo retracted his paper from the Journal of Biological Chemistry last month after the academic fraud scandal erupted, NTU professor of psychology Huang Kwang-kuo （黃光國） accused Kuo of lying when he said he was innocent at a news conference on Dec. 20.Kuo filed a request to pull the paper, which was found by the journal to contain forged results shown in six duplicated images, on Dec. 7, and on Dec. 30, the journal issued a statement that it had been retracted, Huang said.Huang asked why Kuo had not repaid Yen Men-luh （嚴孟祿）, a physician at National Taiwan University Hospital’s Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NT$6.73 million （US$208,617） Yen claimed to have lent Kuo between 2002 and 2014 to help Kuo pay a mortgage, referencing another academic scandal that broke last month, in which Kuo allegedly took the money in exchange for Yen to be listed as coauthor on 11 papers by his research team.He also called into question why Kuo had never mentioned the debt during his tenure as a then-National Science Council （now Ministry of Science and Technology） official, even though he was required by law to declare his personal wealth.Liu Yuan-chun （劉源俊）, president of the Chinese-language Science Monthly, said that the academia puts too much emphasis on the number of citations an academic receives when promoting professors, which has tempted many professors to use their connections for them to be listed as coauthors or forge research findings to boost the number of their publications.In response, the university reiterated that the committee is run in an objective manner.The two colleges have met several times to review the papers, and the investigation results are to be submitted to an evaluation committee and an ad hoc committee for review on Friday next week, it said.The evaluation committee will be headed by NTU vice president Chang Ching-ray （張慶瑞） and will operate independently, it said.新聞來源：TAIPEI TIMES

（中央社記者許秩維台北4日電）台大教授涉論文造假，教改論壇今天質疑學校調查委員會的公正性。台大表示，為求公正，校教評會成立特別委員會，以外部委員為主，學校不干涉調查過程。 教改論壇今天舉行「論文掛名事件與台大的未來」記者會，會中指出，台大校長也涉入掛名學術論文造假事件，只由台大醫學院長主持學術倫理案的調查審議，且僅5至7人進行調查，難以讓各界信服、相信會公正，也讓人擔心淪為幫台大校長卸責的「特別」委員會。 台灣大學主任秘書林達德表示，由於論文和醫學院與生科院有關，依照現行規定，醫學院和生科院分別成立獨立的調查小組，原本調查小組的報告會送到校教評會，但為求公正，校教評會也成立特別委員會，以外部委員為主，7位委員有5位是校外人士，其中也包括中研院士。 林達德指出，第一階段調查小組主要負責呈現事實，而特別委員會的調查過程完全獨立，學校不會干涉或過問，預計1月中旬會有調查結果，屆時也會有書面說明對外公告。1060104
1BB7F4D06DDBE9EC
arrow
arrow
    文章標籤
    團購美食永和 楊梅安格斯牛肉 燒烤推薦 樹林 第一 蘆洲安格斯牛肉
    全站熱搜

    stevenskrg3hu 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

    E-mail轉寄